A little something from the mailbox

Law Firm Joins ‘League of NO’

Attorneys Move to Defend Right to Litigate on the Klamath

Portland, OR – Today law partners Ian Security, Hiam Power, and Les Waters spoke out against stability and security in the Klamath Basin alleging that it would undermine the basin’s litigation based economy. Their comments were made in Portland while enjoying sips of shade grown, GMO-free, organic, fair trade, latte’ sweetened with pure brown cane suger -soy, no milk.

“We join with our clients in opposition to the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement which will end litigation as we know it in the Klamath Basin and force lawyers, political extremists of all stripes, and land developers out of work,” stated lawyer Ian Security.

The Firm’s comments come as local KBRA opponents host a meeting to vociferously agree with one another and lay waste to their own self interests today in Klamath Falls.

“This deal would be the end of the Klamath as we know it,” said local elected Doug Missedit, a client of the Firm. “We have a God given American right to ensure that future generations can enjoy the same fear and anxiety as their parents as they struggle to make a living on the family farm! My base expects me to put an end to all attempts at compromise and problem solving and I aim to deliver.”

The Law Firm believes that the KBRA puts an unfair risk on the livelihoods of lawyers, political ideologues and land developers while favoring elite family farmers, ranchers, Tribal and commercial fishermen, and related small businesses. “It is simply un-American to favor local farmers and fishermen over lawyers from Portland and San Francisco. The next thing you know they’ll be having a salmon and potato festival in the middle of Klamath Falls and down river kids will be dancing with up river kids!”

The Firm plans to re-double donations to Oregon Mild, the Resource Conservancy and other groups sharing their commitment to status quo.

###

Security, Power, and Waters
Attorneys at Law
Portland • San Francisco •  New York • London • Tokyo

About our firm: For the past 20 years, Ian Security, Hiam Power, and Les Waters have been working with clients to reduce certainty and enhance economic risk in the Klamath Basin. Working with diverse interests such as out of touch environmental groups, ranchers turned developers, and ideologically driven politicians, our firm has maintained status quo despite the efforts of family farmers and other locals to solve the problems that drive our businesses.

 

Testimonials from Satisfied Clients

“I wouldn’t be where I am today without the help of Security, Power and Waters. I mean, unless people are kept in a constant state of fear and anxiety how could an ideologically driven political extremist like me ever get elected?”

Doug Missedit
Local elected official

“Unless problems remain unresolved, you can’t expect radical environmental groups to scare people into writing checks to our organizations. Without the talented partners at Security, Power, and Waters we could never have maintained status quo so long!”

Ani Causadoo
Executive Director
Oregon Mild

“When farming has a future, land developers don’t. Thankfully, Power, Security, and Waters are here to help me turn risky family farm businesses into ranchettes for the wealthy!”

Roger Dickelson
Farmer turned developer

About these ads

10 Responses

  1. Relatives of Dewey, Cheatham and Howe?

  2. ROFL. Ya nailed it.

  3. These guys are funnier than you.

  4. Shit, bugs, this is hysterically funny. Yo Petey, feel like a boob yet?

  5. Thanks for that. We were already painfully aware.

  6. Yes! Cant believe I have been missing this for over a year. Keep up the good work! Go Gonzo!!

  7. Bonnie has her hands on more than one turkey…if you know that I mean.

  8. Rough day for Mr. Tyson

    http:/humboldtherald.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/massive-lawsuit-targets-eureka-city-manager

    Every dog has his day. It just turns out that this one isn’t yours. Hugs!

  9. The Wall Street Journal – Rural Cleansing – By Kimberley A. Strassel
    Federal authorities were forced to cut off water to 1,500 farms in Oregon’s and California’s Klamath Basin in April because of the “endangered” sucker fish. The environmental groups behind the cutoff continue to declare that they are simply concerned for the welfare of a bottom-feeder. But last month, those environmentalists revealed another motive when they submitted a polished proposal for the government to buy out the farmers and move them off their land.

    This is what’s really happening in Klamath — call it rural cleansing — and it’s repeating itself in environmental battles across the country. Indeed, the goal of many environmental groups — from the Sierra Club to the Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC) — is no longer to protect nature. It’s to expunge humans from the countryside.

    The Greens’ Strategy

    The strategy of these environmental groups is nearly always the same: to sue or lobby the government into declaring rural areas off-limits to people who live and work there. The tools for doing this include the Endangered Species Act and local preservation laws, most of which are so loosely crafted as to allow a wide leeway in their implementation.

    In some cases owners lose their property outright. More often, the environmentalists’ goal is to have restrictions placed on the land that either render it unusable or persuade owners to leave of their own accord.

    The Klamath Basin saga began back in 1988, when two species of suckers from the area were listed under the Endangered Species Act. Things worked reasonably well for the first few years after the suckers were listed. The Bureau of Reclamation, which controls the area’s irrigation, took direction from the Fish and Wildlife Service, and tried to balance the needs of both fish and farmers. This included programs to promote water conservation and tight control over water flows. The situation was tense, but workable.

    But in 1991 the Klamath basin suffered a drought, and Fish and Wildlife noted that the Bureau of Reclamation might need to do more for the fish. That was the environmentalists’ cue. Within two months, the ONRC — the pit bull of Oregon’s environmental groups — was announcing intentions to sue the Bureau of Reclamation for failure to protect the fish.

    The group’s lawsuits weren’t immediately successful, in part because Fish and Wildlife continued to revise its opinions as to what the fish needed, and in part because of the farmers’ undeniable water rights, established in 1907. But the ONRC kept at it and finally found a sympathetic ear. This spring, a federal judge — in deciding yet another lawsuit brought by the ONRC, other environmental groups, fishermen and Indian tribes — ordered an unwilling Interior Department to shut the water off. The ONRC had succeeded in denying farmers the ability to make a living.

    Since that decision, the average value of an acre of farm property in Klamath has dropped from $2,500 to about $35. Most owners have no other source of income. And so with the region suitably desperate, the enviros dropped their bomb. Last month, they submitted a proposal urging the government to buy the farmers off.

    The council has suggested a price of $4,000 an acre, which makes it more likely owners, will sell only to the government. While the amount is more than the property’s original value, it’s nowhere near enough to compensate people for the loss of their livelihoods and their children’s futures.

    The ONRC has picked its fight specifically with the farmers, but its actions will likely mean the death of an entire community. The farming industry will lose $250 million this year. But property-tax revenues will also decrease under new property assessments. That will strangle road and municipal projects. Local businesses are dependent on the farmers and are now suffering financially. Should the farm acreage be cleared of people entirely, meaning no taxes and no shoppers, the community is likely to disappear.

    Nor has the environment won, even at this enormous cost. The fish in the lake may have water, but nothing else does. On the 200,000 acres of parched farmland, animals belonging to dozens of species — rabbits, deer, ducks, even bald eagles — are either dead or off searching for water. And there’s no evidence the suckers are improving. Indeed, Fish and Wildlife’s most recent biological opinions, which concluded that the fish needed more water, have been vociferously questioned by independent biologists. Federal officials are now releasing some water (about 16% of the normal flow) into the irrigation canals, but it doesn’t help the farmers or wildlife much this year.

    Environmentalists argue that farmers should never have been in the “dry” Klamath valley in the first place and that they put undue stress on the land. But the West is a primarily arid region; its history is one of turning inhospitable areas into thriving communities through prudent and thoughtful reallocation of water. If the Klamath farmers should be moved, why not (move) the residents of San Diego and Los Angeles, not to mention the Southwest and parts of Montana and Wyoming? All of these communities survive because of irrigation — water that could conceivably go to some other “environmental” use.

    But, of course, this is the goal. Environmental groups have spoken openly of their desire to concentrate people into cities, turning everything outside city limits into a giant park. A journalist for the Rocky Mountain News recently noted that in June the Sierra Club posted on its Web site a claim that “efficient” urban density is about 500 households an acre. This, in case you’re wondering, is about three times the density of Manhattan’s most tightly packed areas. And it’s not as if there were any shortages of open space in the West. The federal government already owns 58% of the western U.S., with state and local government holdings bumping the public percentage even higher.

    Balanced Stewardship

    Do the people who give money to environmental groups realize the end game is to evict people from their land? I doubt it. The American dream has always been to own a bit of property on which to pursue happiness. This dream involves some compromises, including a good, balanced stewardship of nature — much like what was happening in Klamath before the ONRC arrived. But this dream will disappear — as it already is in Oregon and California — if environmental groups and complicit government agencies are allowed to continue their rural cleansing.
    - Ms. Strassel is an assistant editorial features editor at the Journal.

  10. Its been a rough week for sure

What say you?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 54 other followers