Graphics Dept. up and grosses our shit out

A man with many hats.

172 Responses

  1. There went my dinner — ewwww!

  2. Soooooooo,

    Is this shit gonna finally make it out in public bugs?

    Y’know, the underage thingy that Larr had?

  3. I see a lawsuit in the making.

  4. OMG! That’s over the top….Thanks G.D.

  5. A civil lawsuit against Larry, perhaps?

    Or a criminal suit against Larry and his enabler Garr?

  6. At least put a suit on that guy.

  7. A lawsuit against G.D. for such images. My poor eyes. Might have to gouge them out with a spoon.

  8. I just threw up a little in my mouth.

  9. Oh the hilarity! As funny as this shit is, I can’t sleep tonight guys. Thanks for the help you bastards lol

  10. I like it !

  11. I just lost my dinner. Crap!

    Hey GD you are just lazy twits. How come you couldn’t put a lil naky Gar next to his buddy LG? Quit doing things half ass’d you drunken shits. Now put down the PBR and get back to work.

  12. Ok. Graphics has just equaled the penis BonBon photo. Congrats. Now its time to check the yellow pages for therapists to get us thru this bad picture. Shit. There is hair on his ass and its more than on his pox faced head. Man dudes YOU ROCK!

  13. We can’t wait to hear Hoover whine about how this image doesn’t make sense or muddles the issues. I mean, when did anything on this blog ever pretend to be justified or rational in any way whatsoever?

  14. So if i’m reading the *hint* *hint*, *wink* *wink* clues being thrown out above the Humboldt Mirror is inferring that somewhere along the way Rob Arkley’s enemy Larry Glass had a sexual encounter with a child.

    For the record…

  15. Nah…not a child!, A teenager. Underage with a very mad Dad and a local police chief who thinks sex crimes aren’t worth the time and told Dad its just a he said she said. Also heard our hugable DA doesn’t want to do his job either. Wink wink.

  16. Is that hair on his butt?

  17. LARRY GLASS TOUCHED ME!!!
    My heart, that is.

  18. So 9:52, you have an underage teenage girls heart?

  19. Hey Humbug, How do libel and slander work online? Honestly wondering.

  20. Hey LG is a public official and damn near everyone in this county has been snickering about this. I heard an investigator named Honsal is now looking into this. I guess we should all start using the term “allegedly” since even the dumbest among us knows this is about the most talked about rumor this year. What fries me is that the extreme left nutjobs live on rumor, lies and innuendo but blow a fuse when their hypocracy is exposed. Sure wish the TS would look into it instead of printing another boring MJ article. Seems that they write about “allegations” concerning the everyday Joe Blow, why not a city official. They could either confirm or dispel this immediately if someone had the balls to do their job.

    Well that’s just one man’s opinion

  21. Ps. Talking about the rumor isn’t slander. Saying the rumor is true is. Add to that the “reckless disregard for the truth” standard since the dude is a public official and your thinly veiled threat 10:43 makes you sound pretty stupid and “touchy.”

  22. If anyone has any details about this “alleged” incident, they ought to email the Mirror. I bet they would be interested in hearing some specifics. Then again, maybe they already have the details…

  23. the mirror has all the details; they were just hoping that The TS, or police chief would do their job. I guess way to much to ask when a big fat guy keeps writing “silence checks”…….

  24. VERY good point there Graphics Dept. VERY good indeed.

  25. This is politics at its worst. The graphic art is pretty crude and juvenile,but allowing someone put a story as false as this on blog comments and let it run on without moderation is really bad.. The Mirror has sunk to a new low.

  26. considering the material they have to work with I think it is just perfect.

  27. I don’t know about any of the rest of you, but I have actually studied media law. The landmark 1964 Supreme Court case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan that makes it harder for public figures to sue for libel does establish a standard for actual malice that allows a public figure to collect damages if he/she can prove libel “with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.” Do an intergoogle search and research it for yourself.

    In my opinion, with this post, the Mirror has crossed a line that Larry could take a judge to initiate proceedings to discover the identity of the blog owner for the purposes of filing a libel suit.

  28. 1964? Oh that must be a sucky dialup?

  29. Let Glass rebut on his blog….the HH.

  30. Considering this is almost surely not true it is possibly actionable. Pasting a penis on on a public figure’s face is in bad taste,. but falsely accusing someone of a criminal act is somehow different it would seem. But The Mirror will probably hide behind the notion it was the commentators, not The Mirror that posted these false accusations.. But a judge might look at the cap on the photo and feel differently.

  31. Proggie I am so impressed by your legal prowess I am quivering. You want slime and innuendo get your ass back th the HH. There are allegations out there. Now folks want to know if the allegations are true OR false. If you think that is libel then you need professional help. The NYT case? If that’s it you are full of hot air and very little information re media law.

  32. Pasting a penis vs. a jailbait hat?
    BWAa ha ha ha… C’mon Larry.
    Graphics dept. You have your work cut out for you!

  33. If Marian Brady wants my vote she will address and denounce this. She cannot pretend she doesnt know the mirror exists.

  34. Somehow I doubt Marian Brady ever had 836′s vote…

    How about 836 going over to Heralda’s blog and demanding all the slime tossed on her political enemies be denounced by Bonnie, Larry, etc?

    I thought not…

    721 says: “Considering this is almost surely not true it is possibly actionable”

    Well, this little tidbit has been floating all around Eureka for about a month now; the fact that this blog has before this thread, been deleting stuff mentioning this alleged indescretion tells me that the shit is about to hit the fan, and its gonna go public.

    Then we’ll find out whether or not it “almost surely not true”…

  35. From lasuit101.com:

    When the subject of the writing involves a matter of public interest, the plaintiff (in addition to the common law elements of defamation enumerated above) must prove (1) the falsity of the alleged defamatory statements (no presumption of falsity) and (2) fault on the part of the blogger.

    The type of fault required for this kind of defamation case depends on the status of the plaintiff. If the plaintiff is a public official or public figure malice is required. In New York Times v. Sullivan, the US Supreme Court ruled that malice is present when there is (1) knowledge of the falsity of the statement or (2) reckless disregard as to its falsity. In other words, the blogger acts with malice if he or she writes about something despite knowledge of its falsity or knowing it might be false writes about it anyway.

    Proggie and 7:21. Bite me you hypocritical ignoramus’

  36. Pasting a penis vs. a jailbait hat? Yougoddabeshittnme!

    The first isn’t lible because its true. BonBon is a dickhead. The hat? Well are you gonna sue your spouse 7:21 because he/she/it wears an “I’m with Stupid” T shirt? (Oops you can’t because that would be the truth now and a complete defense) Or how bout your bumper sticker that says Bush is a murderer? Crime or opinion of a political figure? God I detest closed-minded elitist proggies who “know” everything.

  37. Let’s put the legal argument aside for a moment and talk about civility. I’m curious at what point those of you here engaging in a smear of a person’s reputation based on rumor and nothing else decided that this was more important than your own personal dignity. None of you would dare put your name to your smears. What does engaging in this behavior say about your character, your own self-esteem? Larry will be unscathed by this; if anything the vicious attacks on his character will probably work in his favor. But I am sad for those of you have lost your dignity. I hope you can find a way to regain it by doing something positive at some point in your lives.

  38. If you don’t think Bass has a hand in this blog you’re kidding yourself.

  39. Proggie – its a goose gander type thing. First, you raised the “legal argument” that you now want to put aside. Next whenever I visit the proggie blog HH I see the daily smear by progs of who they don’t like and those smears are mostly rumors and nothing else and vicious attacks on proggie enemies. (Which I have always thought pretty sick). No moderation over there. So it rather is like you can dish it out but can’t take it. Talk about a hypocritical position.

  40. I repeat: Come on Larry!

  41. There are a couple pretty sick folks on here. I don’t ordinarily read The Mirror but heard about this and so came to take a look. OK,. I had a peek into the cesspool. Enough for me.

  42. Then go back to Heraldo and swim in the cesspool 10:45.

    Hey Graphics, get your lazy asses up, have some coffee sober up and give us more funny gross shit. Need my cesspool humor fix today.

  43. I agree, 1045, there certainly are, and it could very well be that the sickest of them all has his photo platered on this thread.

    All you Heraldoites who’ve come over here for a gander otta be calling for Larry’s resignation, ala Heraldo’s cry for the HumCo planning commish’s resignation, BEFORE anything was proven.

    You also need to take our bastion of journalism’s fine example and call for Larry’s resignation before anything is proven, because, after all, according to the Times-Standard, it’s the seriousness of the accusations that matter, not necessarily whether or not someone is guilty.

  44. To Clarify,

    In December of 2007, the Times-Standard called for the resignation of HumCo planning commissioner Tom Hermann and Fortuna Mayor John Campbell, not because they were proven to have done anything wrong, but because Mark Lovelace filed conflict of interest allegations with the FPPC, and the FPPC agreed to investigate.

    The T-S, in its infinite wisdome, called for Hermann’s and Campell’s resignations, because of the serious nature of the charges, NOT because they were actually guilty of anything.

    So it is in that spirit, that I call on the T-S to release an editorial calling for the Larrmeister’s resignation in tomorrow’s edition.

  45. Freedom of speech only works when you’re politically correct and non-offensive to the progs.

  46. Yep Cheesedick. That’s the proggie problem.

  47. Cheesedick, such truer words have never been spoken before!

  48. What happened to the Golden Rule here? Treat others as you would like to be treated.

    You are offended by what is said on another blog, and your response is to act in the same manner toward someone else? Because you don’t like him? How do you justify that?

  49. Oh, and by the way, I don’t believe Virginia Bass has anything to do with this blog. I may not agree with her politics, but I think she is a classy person. Those around her are a different story.

  50. doesn’t the Mole work for Virginia Bass’s campaign? she never said he was out. he’s here. she’s here. this is gross politics on their part.

  51. the unfounded larry glass child molestation rumors that began on this blog are a stain on the campaigns of marian brady, virginia bass and mike newman until they publicly state their opposition to this kind of politics. until they do, intelligent people have to assume they have something to hide. they are taking a dangerous gamble by allowing this to happen.

  52. “unfounded”

    That’s why its currently under investigation by the DA’s office. hmmm

  53. Freedom of the press: applicable only to those whom agree with Heraldo? Since when are Bass, et al, responsible for this blog? Or even to denouce it?

  54. The problem is proggie that way too many of your cohorts don’t feel the same way and have been spewing rumor, slime and even outright lies against their perceived opponents for so long and with such intensity that your complaint now falls on ears made deaf by the hypocracy of it. So you don’t think these allegations aren’t important? I have grown tired of the double standard.

    For the most part I find this blog as a hilarious satire of the insane far ultra left and political hacks who don’t stand for squat other then their own selfish self interests.

  55. Larry Glass has done good in the community.

  56. Do the right thing, Marian.

  57. Who runs this blog?

  58. Bullshit on you 4:07. This crap didn’t begin here. I had heard the allegations weeks ago and heard it was under investigation. You are the one using the term child molest. I heard it was a bit different. This has everything to do with Glass and nobody else. If the allegations aren’t true great. If they are true that dude needs to go.

  59. The problem is proggie that way too many of your cohorts don’t feel the same way and have been spewing rumor, slime and even outright lies against their perceived opponents for so long and with such intensity that your complaint now falls on ears made deaf by the hypocracy of it. So you don’t think these allegations aren’t important? I have grown tired of the double standard.

    You don’t like what some other blog is doing, so you feel that gives you license to smear someone you don’t like based on a rumor you heard around town? What does that say about you?

  60. Let it be known, until you can produce evidence that this was heard “around town” everyone knows the rumor started on the Humboldt Smear.

  61. The first time Larry Glass had sex it was with his mother in an outhouse. Your proggies have short memories. You cheered when Larry Flint said this about Pat Robertson and it was upheld as freedom of speech.

  62. Proggie if you weren’t posting so much on that other blog I might be able to understand but you and your buddies are some of the cruelist gossipers and baldfaced smearmongers. Think what you want cause these allegations did not start here so I still call you on bullshit. I will wait to see what comes from the investigation and what if anything was said.

  63. Lordy, Lordy Bugs, this is almost some weird sort of internet porn…note I said almost. To truly qualify as porn, it needs some more naked people, like, oh say, Sue Brandenbrug and the background should be the Jefferson School building.

  64. Oh shite JB that’s so funny!

  65. A big difference between the Heraldo blog and this one is that mane real people comment on Heraldo and give their real names. As far as I can see, I am the only one that admits to reading both. 64 posts and I am the only one with a name. Say what you want about the progressives but at least some of them will go on the record unlike you cowards.

  66. Lordy lordy lord. It was Falwell having sex with his mom I think and not Pat R. WTF has rattled the chains of the Glass apologists. An I heart JB hat? Uh, guess they forgot the crimes and immorality slung over the last 6 or 7 years.

  67. I meant to write, many real people comment on Heraldo. Typo. I am after, all the only real person that posted on this thread. Real people make mistakes.

  68. Yes Tom they do. Most of us understand that.

  69. I don’t have a dog in most of these fights. I don’t live in Eureka. I’m just saying that Heraldo and other progs put out a lot of truth that, without a lot of research, can be confirmed. This blog does sometimes have breaking stories and good content but mixes it up with so much drama, innuendo and Photo Shop that it becomes hard to sift through the BS to get to the real story.

    Both blogs are anonymous and that part is equal, but I think most progs would be embarrassed to put out this kind of trash.
    That is what sets the two groups apart.

  70. Most progs would be embarrassed if even a fraction of what is being said here is true. WHAT DID LARRY do to attract so much attention that this can’t be settled immediately and a cowardly blogger can open make fun of this “rumor.”

  71. This is politics at its worst. The graphic art is pretty crude and juvenile,but allowing someone put a story as false as this on blog comments and let it run on without moderation is really bad.. The Mirror has sunk to a new low.

    While we strongly disagree it’s known whether this is false, we mostly agree with all of your highly intuitive observations above. Otherwise, we strongly object to your assertion that we’ve sunk to a new low. You really haven’t been following us for very long. Douche.

  72. Considering this is almost surely not true it is possibly actionable. Pasting a penis on on a public figure’s face is in bad taste,. but falsely accusing someone of a criminal act is somehow different it would seem. But The Mirror will probably hide behind the notion it was the commentators, not The Mirror that posted these false accusations.. But a judge might look at the cap on the photo and feel differently.

    Whatever. Consider the fact you can’t say it isn’t true, right? And pasting a penis on a public figure’s head isn’t a senseless of act of bad taste, it’s a lot of work. Photoshop doesn’t have a “Put an unattractive and goat-like penis on a supervisors nose” filter yet. You have hurt our feelings for the last time.

  73. gross

  74. You’re a boisterous bunch tonight Graphics Dept! Homos.

  75. Heraldo puts out truth??? ummm…. what color is the sky in your world???

  76. I support Larry Glass.

  77. Have another glass of koolaid 6:55.

    Hey Graphics. What’s next?

  78. Tom Tom Tom. What planet did you come from to say that? This is getting funnier by the moment.

  79. Most people posting on Heraldo use their REAL NAMES????

    Uhhhh, Tom I call BULLSHIT on that.

    Lets pick out the biggest assholes on that blog:
    Plain Jane, NotANative, BigAl, AverageEurekan, Cheesedick, HiFi – and the list goes on and on, not to mention that most posters just post under “anonymous”, as well as “Heraldo” …

    You mean to say that most on that blog use their REAL names?

    Uhhhhh, BULLSHIT.

  80. Quick check of the 72 post New Man thread on Heraldo shoes that about 92 percent of the posts are ANONYMOUS….

    And, Tom – the first NONanon to post was Chris Crawford, hardly a proggie.

  81. I support Larry Glass too.

  82. OH MAN!!! THE MIRROR CHANGED THE IMAGE!!!

    Sorry, smear artist. That’s not gonna change any legal action coming your way. In a way, it’s an admission of guilt.

    You can comment on your own blog all you want to try and push the story that “people around town are saying it” but everyone knows the unfounded Larry Glass statutory rape rumors STARTED ON THE HUMBOLDT MIRROR!!!

  83. OOoo. I feel kinda famous that an anon mentioned me!
    GD, I will program you a custom PS filter that places penises adjacent to public officials faces. Just send me your 3 1/2″ floppy.

  84. Neither the DA’s office nor any reputable law enforcement agency is investigating these salacious unfounded rumors because there are absolutely no facts including a named victim. If there were any basis to this at all law enforcement would be all over it. There are plenty of people who would love to take out Larry and somehow implicate the police chief. Unfortunately for all of you single digit IQ folks don’t understand the system. Anyone with facts can call law enforcement and have areport taken. Since no facts exist it is no surprise that the police haven’t been contacted. This is character assassination pure and simple and anyone with half a brain can figure that out.

  85. ooohhhhh, anon says “no facts exist”…

    I have it first hand from TWO law enforcement officers that there are allegations being investigated…

    Allegations that may or may not turn out to be “facts”…

    Your blanket denial is not based on “facts”, but rather your wish that the allegations not be true…are they? Hopefully time will tell.

  86. mirror is running scared. you’ll notice humbug hasn’t commented on this thread (using her official avatar) in a while. I never seen her wimp out like this. she knows what she did.

    in case anyone was worried i saved the original image as i’m sure a lot of other people did.

    the right in humboldt will be exposed.

  87. “the right in humboldt will be exposed”?

    What does that even mean? Can you please use English from now on. It actually matters what order you place the words in a sentence.

  88. “the right in humboldt will be exposed”

    good double (maybe triple) meaning

  89. Come on Mark K. You know you want to post. We know you’re here…

  90. This is pure slander,and if not then those who run this blog should certainly step up and give every little detail of the supposed event they are alluding to,since they started it all by putting out scant details while apparently having access to more of them.My guess is that they do not have any further evidence and this is just an attempt to smear Larry at all costs because they now realize that Larry is going to win the election because he has done a fine job as a councilmember,and those opposed to him see now that Brady doesn’t have what it takes to defeat Larry by staying focused on things relevant to city government,so as a last resort,they turn to dirty politics to smear someone they dislike.It’s kind of interesting that some who support Brady who post on the herald and who have some common sense and tend to stick to issues of importance gave Brady at least a long shot at winning.This post here,and this blog in general show otherwise.And to those who believe that Virginia is not somehow involved with this blog and those behind it,you are naive.Now that is not to say that she agrees with all of its content,as she is indeed a very nice person.

  91. Hey Anon 1:19 p.m., 12:49 p.m. and 10:43 a.m. today, on 08/20 at 9:52 a.m., on 08/20 at 6:35 a.m. and “Chris” on 08/14 5:40 pm:

    You’re really putting in some overtime on this one, huh?

  92. Then again mresquan, maybe Larry did do something incredibly inappropriate, possibly illegal, with a teen? That would show a very serious lack of sound judgment from an elected official who is charged with making decisions for the entire city. What would you say when the facts do come out and Larry isn’t innocent? That it’s a smear job from a blogger? A blogger didn’t start this. Larry did.

  93. “A blogger didn’t start this. Larry did.”
    True,so long as you want to live in a society where one is guilty until innocence is proven.The facts aren’t out yet,so why the automatic assumption that he did something?

  94. Well, I am leaving my mind open to the fact it might be true. Most of you Glass apologists are categorically denying anything happened and are writing this off as political smear. Again, what will you say if it’s true?

  95. If the mirror has info about Larry Glass that they are keeping from the public then we could accuse them of protecting a child molester by not releasing the info.

    The mirror is too smart for that. Which is proof that there is no basis for the allegations and its just a way to get more hits for this pathetic cry for help of a blog. Mirror started a rumor to damage a man that stands for something his financiers are against.

    This post will be attacked by another Anonymous. Anonymous 1:49 = the mirror.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if this post finally leads to the deletion of this blog. Good riddance.

  96. Who said anything about child molester? You did. Remember?

  97. Trying to find those Anti Glass ville stickers I have been seeing around town. Anyone know where I can find one? Google isn’t helping

  98. I hope someone gets to the bottom of this.

    Tthere is another rumor and that is that the Humboldt Hearald is Larry Glass’ blog

    who knows what the truth is?

  99. I think Pierson’s has the anti-Glassville stickers. Oh wait, probably not. Nevermind.

  100. The truth is that Larry fucked up big time and all the threats regarding this blog spreading slanderous lies is all a bunch of chest pounding. The saying “where there is smoke, there’s fire” comes to mind. And if you follow this smoke, it’ll take you to a flaming hot piece of slime called Larry.

  101. Correction: where there’s smoke, there either was, or is going to be, fire. Until then, hot air.

  102. Man! The ultra left meltdown. You guys (or gals) aren’t very smart are you?

    3:19 is correct – this is a bunch of chest pounding. I am assuming that LG is sane and any sane person would want all of this to disappear. Here is why: he would have to prove that there were never any allegations ever made to EPD or the DA or anyone. And he would have to prove that the folks who are writing and talking about this knew that there were never any allegations. He is a f’ing politician and its a different standard then us regular guys. Hey, have any of you ever seen Perez hilton blog?

  103. I have to agree 3:54. In fact, all of the people on Larry’s side who are supporting him and think he’s completely innocent or who are defending him and know he’s guilty are only perpetuating what Larry would like to see go away fast.

  104. I still haven’t heard one of the people who are defending Larry offer anything in the way of an answer to “what if it’s true?” And it is true, just so you know….

  105. “And it is true, just so you know…”

    How do you know.And so you know,he’s having a spaghetti feed tonight and you should be out to protect people from him by showing up and preventing him from doing something hurtful to someone.Put on your cape while doing so.Why are you intent on letting him walk around freely when you know he did something wrong,and why are you aiding him by refusing to let all of who read this blog in exact detail what you “know” he did?
    If he’s guilty,well I will say shame on him and he should be punished to laws’ full extent.

  106. Mark, I think you need another bong (ahem medicine) hit. I think it is admirable to stand up for your friend, and I am being serious but from what so many people in the know have been talking about from Trinidad down to SoHum you are probably in for hell of a wild ride…so fasten your seatbelt dude.

  107. So Mark,

    Ask Larry tonight. Ask him if there is any truth to the allegation that Larry had an innapropriate relationship with a young lady under the age of 18.

    Ask him if there is any truth to the allegation that when Larry found out the girl was under 18, that he went to the chief of police, Garr Neilson and that Garr stopped an investigation by a EPD officer.

    Ask him, Mark, then report back here.

  108. And Mark, while you’re feeding your face with some mediocre spaghetti, be sure to ask him about how mad the father was that he went to the chief of police, who arranged a meeting between Larry, the dad and himself. Ask him what was said in that meeting. We’d all like to know what Larry has to say about that meeting. Because, really, if nothing is going on and it’s all just slander started by this blog, why would Garr have a meeting with a dad and Larry more than a month ago?

  109. “So Mark,

    Ask Larry tonight. Ask him if there is any truth to the allegation that Larry had an innapropriate relationship with a young lady under the age of 18.

    Ask him if there is any truth to the allegation that when Larry found out the girl was under 18, that he went to the chief of police, Garr Neilson and that Garr stopped an investigation by a EPD officer.

    Ask him, Mark, then report back here.”

    Actually,I won’t be going tonight but Larry has already told me face to face that whatever he was being accused of,that they were blatant false charges.

  110. “that he went to the chief of police, Garr Neilson and that Garr stopped an investigation by a EPD officer.”

    Well perhaps that investigation was going nowhere and Garr thought that the officers time was better spent elsewhere instead of being stuck on a case which wasn’t proving anything.

  111. You asked Larry and he said no. Well Mark, I guess that settles everything, huh? I guess that is what judges are for…to decide what is and what isn’t a blatant false charge.

  112. Uh Mark, are you naïve or stupid?

    Here’s whaT will convince me and that is EPD and the DA saying there are no allegations, no reports no nada. Like you think Larry would admit to this? Yougottabekiddinme!

  113. mresquan

    “perhaps the investigation was going nowhere and Garr thought the officers time was better spent elswhere instead of being stuck on a case which wasn’t proving anything” ?

    Are you for real?

    You’re inferring that Garr, the Chief of Police, stepped in to stop the investigation of a public official before it could be proved or disproved!

    I had heard the rumor but didn’t really think it could be true.

  114. “You asked Larry and he said no. Well Mark, I guess that settles everything, huh?”

    At least Larry wasn’t hiding behind an anonymous veil when he told me that,unlike yourself.But no,it doesn’t settle everything,however the facts to support your claim seem to be missing,which could be why Garr stopped whatever investigation there was,and unless they appear and are validated,a judge won’t ever hear or decide on a damn thing.

    “Like you think Larry would admit to this? Yougottabekiddinme!”

    Like you would be willing to step away from your anonymity and post under your own name and then claim you know Larry is guilty of something.Larry had no problem defending himself,do you have a problem with defending your claim under your real name?We shall see.

  115. If you don’t like The Humboldt Mirror, then don’t read The Humboldt Mirror. It’s that easy……..Man, the weather in Eureka was great today.

  116. It was fantastic here in Loleta as well.

  117. If you really believe the Chief of police would stop an investigation of a public official under the circumstances you describe and the officer or someone in the police department would not report it you are crazy. If there was a report the chief couldn’t a.d wouldn’t make it disappear particularly since Larry is identified as an ally. You must be thinking of the old EPD where shit like that probably happenedall all the time

  118. 80 degrees in McKinleyville…so nice! Did lots of gardening.

  119. Wow you are naïve and assuming a lot!

    I am not that poster but I simy can’t get over you. Over the last couple of years I have seen some foLks get their shit buried and others gone after only because they are considered enemies. Your naivete isn’t surprising and explains a lot of why some of these corrupt folks stay in office.

  120. Mark,

    Remember that little talk we had about keeping both hands on top of the sheets. You are have a big wet dream about Larry G.
    What, did the picture excite you. Damn buddy you are out in left ****in field. If I were you I would shut the **** up cause you are looking stupider every time you post.

  121. He just never bought into the fact that when you destroy brain cells they DON’T grow back.

  122. “connect the dots, on August 22, 2010 at 10:26 pm Said:

    Mark,

    Remember that little talk we had about keeping both hands on top of the sheets. You are have a big wet dream about Larry G.
    What, did the picture excite you. Damn buddy you are out in left ****in field. If I were you I would shut the **** up cause you are looking stupider every time you post.”

    Okay there Sun Valley Floral Bulldog Connector,how can I shut the fuck up when I am not talking?
    Anyways,back to the topic,where is the evidence that Larry slept with an underage girl?Why is the officer who “apparently” had the case tossed,not speaking out?And no I don’t remember the talk you are talking about,refresh my memory please.

  123. I get it now…Larry has sent Mark in to downplay this whole thing.

  124. Mark its sooo interesting to read what goes through your weird brain. Wtf do you even mean? You are sounding more and nore desperate with each post and man it ain’t pretty dude.

    This shit will eventually come out. Either it is or it isn’t a fact that there was a report. I’d think that you’d want to shut the fuck up so if it doesn’t play they way you hope it does you don’t read like a conplete (as opposed to partial) moron. Now have some more koolaid dude and calm the F@@@ down.

  125. I support Larry Glass…

  126. You went too far this time Humbug.
    Apologize. Not from the “Anonymous” handle you’ve used in this thread for most of it’s duration. Use your only slightly less cowardly “Humbug” Avatar.

  127. 5:50 good morning. This as one of the 100+ anons commenting here. Not the Humbug but thx for the complement.

  128. THE HAT IS CHANGED AGAIN!!! You should at least acknowledge how the information and images are changing by noting it somewhere in the post, to be honest.

  129. I almost pissed my pants. An anon, on a blog calling for honesty. Oh no, not that, next thing you will be saying is that Larry is honest in his actions. This rumor as far as I am concerned is bullshit until he is convicted of some crime, until then just trash talk. The responses are priceless.

  130. kinda like getting shoved in front of a 100 people and no one saw it that kind of trash talk?

  131. Hey jackhole, the image has changed again. Just so you know.

  132. Wow, the folks at Security National really hate Larry! I knew the whole incident at the Costal Commish mixer, but I had no clue the hate spread this deep!

    Hope this blog make y’all feel better

  133. Don’t fret now, Cue, the truth will come out, then you’re gonna look like the buffoon you are…

  134. Hey as long as this posting offends all you poor defenseless little political softies, bugs’ job is complete! hehehe

  135. Well if the mole/bulldog supports the mirror…

  136. Ok that’s it for this blog. I can’t take it any more the “I Eat Shit” hat made me blow my smoothie out of my nose. It stung like hell and I am gonna sue for the injury. Be on guard you’ve been warned!

  137. Drink Up Buttercup! You know I support you GD. Screw these progolatitees that don’t have a sense of humor.
    Larry (Heralda) SUCKS!!!

  138. Did you guys know that opinion and random stuff said on a blog or the internet is not a fact or truth? The internet never lies to you!!!! OH NO! Apparently everyone but you guys knows that. I’m only reacting this way because I’m growing weary of everybody’s constant fruitless efforts to ID me for real. Its kind of tiring but you won’t stop me ever

  139. Inside….most of us…now, bear with me here – do not give a fuck who you are…go back into your momma’s closet with that ladies home journal and some hand cream and let yourself go…

    Stop fucking hijacking these threads.

    Now – back to business – I am curious bugs.

    Why, after a month or so of deleting posts from commenters mentioning this supposedly burgeoning scandal, do you have a thread on it?

    My reaction when I first saw it before the start of the weekend was – well, something is about to hit the news….and….four days later…ZIP, ZERO, NADA….

    I do confess, it makes you look a bit…lame. If there’s fire here, out with it, otherwise this thread just looks silly, twisting in the wind…

    Disappointedly yours…

  140. You are shitting us right 7:/17? Hey its a free world and there is certainly someone twisting but it aint the bug.

  141. Or worse…. slander

  142. Hey Jack – just a suggestion, try writing a full complete sentence. Didn’t you graduate from grammar school? Also, slander? This isn’t and can’t be for a couple of reasons; there are no oral statements here (just everywhere else like work and restaurants) and; second everyone is pretty clear that these are allegations which are rampant in this entire county and have been for well over a month. (I heard about the allegations at work well over a month ago and just shook my head waiting for the first person to start writing about them.) Guess folks in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

  143. Hey its not me hijacking this thread. Its the people who are so desperately politically butt fucked that they have to do everything they can to slander a candidate, even when its untrue and unrelated. Blame those pea brains.

  144. “I EAT SHIT!”. That’s hysterically funny and irreverent.
    You bugs are just great. Do good look good. Do bad leave town. OMG.

  145. I feel for ya Security National. Good luck with the Coastal Commish. Y’all need it-

  146. Just to remind everyone:

    THE ANONYMOUS HUMBOLDT MIRROR BLOG HAS ALLEGED THAT EUREKA CITY COUNCILMAN LARRY GLASS HAD SEXUAL CONTACT WITH AN UNDERAGE GIRL. GLASS FACES MARIAN BRADY FOR REELECTION IN NOVEMBER.

  147. inside sun valley, I mean, Chris, your starting to worry me that you be following me around in your VW. Your “Bulldog” ways are too much for me. Go back to harrassing Bonnie.

  148. Underage Girl? Well, that’s a relief.
    For a minute there I thought he was a catholic priest.

  149. the ID of the Insider(mole) can be seen @

    http://campaigninput.livejournal.com/682.html

    Chris, next time dont forget to delete all of your shortcomings.

  150. awe looks like you took my advice.

  151. So,

    Again, Where is the “jailbait”?

    Why, after deleting posts mentioning this do you put this thread up, without a shred of evidence?

  152. ???????? Are you high 8:14 or just dense? This is a satire blog. Do you walk around with cotton in your ears and blinders on?

  153. High and dense are not mutually exclusive.
    Even among elected officials.

  154. Any more news on this important issue?

  155. apparently not; according to 10:04, its all just “satire”.

  156. Satire, truthful about the allegations (which nobody yet knows if truth or not) and wen it comes to the graphics “I Eat Shit” is FUNNY!

  157. You probably have good reasons why you dislike Larry Glass, but I think this crude attempt at humor makes him more sympathetic. I really hate this whole phenomena of using blogs to conduct character assasination.

    People can destroy another’s reputation by recklessly posting slanderous information on blogs.

    I may sound corney, but I think these attacks are unAmerican”.

  158. Read the political stuff written by the founding fathers and you will see it is fact very American

  159. Uh, Adams and Jefferson come to mind. And that shit was really bad, but you would have to know history.

  160. I agree with the opinion that attacking Larry Glass just makes him more sympathetic to voters. And Marian Brady just rubs people the wrong way.

  161. I HATE Marian Brady because of this!

  162. 9:02. Hahahha! You just hate Marion and it doesn’t matter why.

  163. PS. 8:58. He is pathetic NOT sympathetic.

    That being said, I agree that some blogs are used to lie attack and smear. Just look at the comments on HH. This blog just makes fun of hypocrites.

  164. Anybody know what the cities policy is with respect to investigations regarding City Council members? It seems a little unethical for the Police Department to conduct the investigation due to the obvious conflict of interest stemming from the fact that the Poilce Chief works for the council. Kinda hard to ethically investigate your boss. I believe that typically all investigations of Council Members are handled by an unaffiliated agency like the DA’s office, Attorney General, DEA, whatever makes sense given the type of issue. I have no idea what might or might not have happened in this instance but I am sure it should not be investigated by Eureka PD. Any idiot could see the problem and Garr is no idiot…….

    Anyway, what’s the formal policy?

  165. Boycott The Works until hes in jail!!!?!

  166. I like this!

  167. I’ve been boycotting the Works for 30 years

  168. That’s not what that hat used to say. Bad form.

  169. WTF would I have to boycott the Works for? What do they have there? unless they sell medical MJ.

  170. all hat, no cattle. not larry, but this tepid rumor.

  171. Oh the hilarity! As funny as this shit is, I can’t sleep tonight guys. Thanks for the help you bastards lol

    VERY good point there Graphics Dept. VERY good indeed.

    Cheesedick, such truer words have never been spoken before!

    Hey as long as this posting offends all you poor defenseless little political softies, bugs’ job is complete! hehehe

    Did you guys know that opinion and random stuff said on a blog or the internet is not a fact or truth? The internet never lies to you!!!! OH NO! Apparently everyone but you guys knows that. I’m only reacting this way because I’m growing weary of everybody’s constant fruitless efforts to ID me for real. Its kind of tiring but you won’t stop me ever

    Hey its not me hijacking this thread. Its the people who are so desperately politically mind fucked that they have to do everything they can to slander a candidate, even when its untrue and unrelated. Blame those pea brains.

  172. CH you get all flustered when we call you by your real name Chris. You should really watch your language because God and your mom & dad would not appreciate it. Another mole bites the dust.

What say you?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 54 other followers