In daring social experiment, Gallegos learns the hard way that dismissing felony sex offenses does little to make our community safer

"Okay, but Allison Jackson can't surf for shit."

 But who knew, right?  

I mean, at the very least it was worth a try. Or fifty tries, or a hundred, or however many it’s been since we hitched our criminal justice wagon to this stark raving ballsack.   

But don’t take our word for it. Let’s hear the story from the the Times-Standard and the district attorney himself. Because somehow it sounds even stupider that way.  

This is the third time [Dr. Robert Alan] Mott, 59, has been charged with a sex-related crime. Thus far, he has not been convicted. In 1997, he went to trial on a charge of child molestation and was promptly acquitted by the jury. In June 2004, the longtime local physician was accused of felony sexual battery of a female patient, and also of later stalking the woman. Criminal charges were dismissed in June 2007 after Mott complied with a variety of conditions demanded by the prosecution….  

“Certainly we are familiar with Dr. Mott,” Gallegos said, “and because of that familiarity we see his conduct as very, very serious. It’s completely unacceptable.”  

Gallegos said that in the past Mott received an acquittal and then a warning, but “here we see Dr. Mott again.”  

I mean–Shut your pants!! Here he fucking is again, that naughty Dr. Mott. I totally would have thought a warning would do the trick.  

But hey. Since our county is clearly on the cutting edge of alternative punishment, we took the liberty of compiling a quick list of other penalties the DA might employ to address Dr. Mott’s improprieties. Gallegos could: 

  • Send him to bed without supper.
  • Wash his weiner out with soap.
  • Suspend his allowance.
  • Give him an exceptionally stern talking to.
  • Call a good five or ten minute time-out. (Tough love, people. Tough. Love.)
  • Have him write 50 times on a blackboard “I will sexually assault fewer people.”
  • Take away his porn and video games for a week.

Or, and this is more likely to be the approach Gags takes, screw this up again so someone else gets hurt.  

Let’s just put it this way: Certainly we are familiar with Paul Gallegos, and because of that familiarity we see his conduct as very, very serious. It’s completely unacceptable.  

And just like Dr. Mott’s new charges–completely, devastatingly predictable.

13 Responses

  1. Another home run, bugs. Fucking hysterically funny, and right on the money.

  2. And even lamer, due to the lower standard of proof needed for action, is the State of California Medical Board, which has allowed this psycho to continue to “practice” medicine on real live people. Or, as Doctor Mott refers to them, “potential victims”.

  3. I don’t know, Mr. Malloy. It really is difficult to imagine anyone lamer than Paul Gallegos.

  4. I know from friends in law enforcement that it’s far worse at the D.A.s office then this story even hints at. We all need to get behind Allison Jacksons campaign. She’s an aggresive prosecutor especially on child sexual abuse cases. It’s time to say enough is enough and get out and put up signs, contrube,walk neighborhoods for her and get the word out anyway we can. It’s going to to be a tough campaign because all the dopers are going to turn out to vote on Prop. 19. If you plan to continue living in Humboldt County we can’t affor to lose this one.

  5. This blog reads like an abused 6 years old writes it. Just sayin-
    And by the way, you suck at photoshop….

  6. In other words, despite Paul’s abysmal record, Sandy’s still going to vote for him. That’s okay. Bob Doran’s wife is probably going to do the same.

  7. SandyK, I think you fail to factor in the massive PBR consumption which is the hallmark of the grap..whoops I mean Graphics Department. Given that, the fact that they can click on anything is pretty impressive. I would have said an abused 15-year-old, but that’s just because I have a teenager at home.

  8. OMG, Sandy! Actually, TWO abused six-year-olds write it. But close enough! Douchebug–tell her what she’s won!!

  9. …chortle… snort… guffaw…

    You guys kill me.

  10. is the case now? Per the TS article, the DA continued it in June to July. It is, according to rumor, September. Which is two months after July. What happenedont the July date? I assume the DA will force the case to trial, if necessary whipsaw Motts victim like he did Darci Seal in the Gunderson case, because after all, the DA says Dr. Mott is bad, so surely all the stops will be pulled out and we will see a no holds barred all out effort to protect the public. Soon. Any minute now. Or maybe it will turn out that Mott was just adjusting his radio and was momentarily distracted.

  11. Every vote for Gags is a selfish person who doesn’t care about child abuse, rape, murder, domestic violence and protecting law-abiding citizens.

    Who cares if sex offenders, pedophiles, druggies get a slap on the wrist? As long as you have your pot, your radical enviromental demands, and state of denial.

    It’s time for a D.A who knows the law and knows crime isn’t down.

  12. And now contestant number two! What woman without a clue has now become woman without a district.
    Here’s a clue, she has called in the surveyor for a little Fung Shui of the district line. Will it bring her health and happiness and increase her chi? The fates at this time Decline to State

  13. Shit Bunny. A bit cryptic aren’t we?

What say you?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 54 other followers